English > Feature Suggestions

Feature suggestions poll

(1/2) > >>

buah:
So, let's try to contribute, and to help nostra and rick by polling, too. More information here

rick.ca:
To save others the pain of that long and unproductive thread...


--- Quote from: rick.ca on January 30, 2010, 03:24:17 am ---So to recap: Linking two fields so one changes with the other is a bad idea. Adding the option to do so would unlikely create any problems (especially if the default is 'off'), and some users would appreciate the convenience. Unfortunately, if nostra made the mistake of reading this far, he no longer has the time to implement this. ;D
--- End quote ---

So, given the way the poll is worded, I have to vote an emphatic NO!

Please vote in my Dead Horse poll.  ;D

patch:

--- Quote from: buah on January 30, 2010, 02:01:42 am ---So, let's try to contribute

--- End quote ---

Agree
Actually adding the poll to the original thread would have been sensible if it was possible as summaries can clearly be biased.


--- Quote from: rick.ca on January 30, 2010, 03:31:23 am ---Please vote in my Dead Horse poll.  ;D

--- End quote ---

One thread per topic is more sensible than one thread per opinion imo.
My reading of buah original thread is he is not at all against making the dependency configurable, so the 2 polls are asking the same question.

buah:

--- Quote from: patch on January 30, 2010, 01:56:04 pm ---My reading of buah original thread is he is not at all against making the dependency configurable, so the 2 polls are asking the same question.
--- End quote ---

Absolutely definitely! Never was against it. So, if you agree the subject could be changed to "Would you like an option to have "Seen" checkbox automatically flagged while rating the movie?". Or, it hasn't to be subjected here, but wherever you like, and subjected as you like it. The idea is important, and I never questioned technique how to get it.

CAD:
i voted yes.
i'll add a caveat.
this should be optional.
i do not agree that users should have to change the way they think to use a particular piece software.
All software should be adaptable to users needs. As long as a changes dont hinder or affect the way other users use software. Change can only be good. Software that doesn't meet the needs of end users is destined to fail.

At the end of the day - Nostra is the developer he can do whatever he likes. If he likes the ideas put forward and is willing to implement it, then great. If he does not want to make changes - then bad luck, deal with the software as is or change to something else that meets your needs.

my $0.02

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page